Masthead header

How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera

By Photographer Patrick J. Endres Updated 9/8/2011

If you find the information here helpful please link back to this page.
Thank you ~ Patrick

Photographing the aurora in Alaska's arctic

How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera

Introduction

Common green color caused by oxygen gasses. Brooks mountain range, Alaska. © Patrick J. Endres

For many, just viewing the aurora borealis is a life-long dream. And to capture them with a camera is both a thrilling and awe inspiring experience.

Before the advent of the digital camera, photographing the aurora with slide film was complicated and often involved a good deal of experimenting. When I used to guide trips back in those days, clients were attached to the hip looking for experienced-based guidance on exposure times and camera settings. Without being able to view the results until weeks later, that was essential. While the digital camera has not removed the need for experience, its immediate feedback has opened up photographic opportunities for many that may have otherwise been failed attempts. With today’s average digital SLR and a good lens and tripod, you are likely to get some very satisfactory images.

This article is intended to give you some necessary information to help guide you in your aurora photography venture. While much of what is written below is general in nature and applies to most all digital cameras, the many, many brands and models have their own uniqueness. I will focus on Canon digital SLR’s, since that is what i shoot.

  1. WHERE AND WHEN TO VIEW THE AURORA
  2. HOW TO DRESS – WHAT TO WEAR
  3. CAMERA AND OTHER GEAR
  4. EXPOSURE – HISTOGRAMS – FILE TYPE
  5. AURORA SHOOTING CHECKLIST

A FEW AURORA RESOURCES

1) Where and when to view the aurora:

WHERE TO VIEW THE NORTHERN LIGHTS?

Moon rise over the Chandalar shelf at midnight, Brooks range, Alaska. © Patrick J. Endres

Because the aurora are drawn to the earth’s magnetic poles, far northern & southern latitudes offer excellent opportunities for viewing auroral displays. Some points to consider when selecting a location for aurora photography:

  • Geographic Latitude: It would be ideal, although not necessary to find a spot within the auroral belt. (According to Dr. Syun-Ichi Akasofu, this is the polar region where the aurora is visible about two-thirds of the year). I live in Fairbanks, about 65 degrees latitude, which is geographically well situated for aurora viewing.
  • Light Pollution Free: Go somewhere free of light pollution, far from city lights or airports.
  • Direction/Orientation: Most of the shooting orientation will be between the northwest and southeast sky. With this in mind, position yourself to shoot with light sources (towns or cities) to your south. When solar storms are very strong and hit the earth’s atmosphere with strength, both the northern and southern sky will contain the aurora, and often in some wild colors.
  • Consider a Pellet gun: This may come in handy when you need to quietly turn off your neighbors yard lard light. OK, I am truly kidding, there are more diplomatic ways but I must confess, I have thought of it before.

WHEN IS THE BEST TIME OF YEAR?

Aurora activity is directly connected with solar storm activity on the surface of the sun. Therefore, being aware of this will help determine the optimal times for viewing the most active aurora displays. According to SpaceWeather.com, statistically speaking, March is the most geomagnetically active month of the year; October is a close second. Although the reasons why are not fully understood, there is no doubt that equinoxes favor auroras. This graph from their website plots geomagnetic activity per month. Remember however, that times of year that have less storms and more clear skies can be equally, if not more, productive from a statistical perspective also.

From www.spaceweather.com: "March is the most geomagnetically active month of the year; October is a close second".

Aurora forecast app for iphone

Some scientists predict the years of 2013-2015 to produce very good aurora displays.

  • The UAF Geophysical Institute now offers their Northern Lights forecasts through an Iphone App
  • The Spring and Vernal equinoxes have been noted as especially good times (March 21/Sept 21 – approximately) However, I’ve seen amazing aurora during all times of the year.

AURORA BOREALIS FORECASTS

If you are checking aurora forecast websites, keep in mind that low activity can still be very acceptable for photography, particularly in the northern regions. So actually, your location may be more critical than the intensity of the aurora display. Below are a few links to aurora activity prediction and forecast sites:

  • UAF Geophysical InstituteOffers Alaska-based auroral display predictions both in a long and short term context. Since there are many variables effecting whether or not the aurora will actually be visible, these predictions are generalized, in particular, the long term forecast.

    Band represents range and extent of aurora borealis visibility in the AK. The graph is not a current prediction, click to check current status.


  • Space Weather
  • Solarcycle 24
  • NOAA’s POES website (Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite) offers a general, and fairly simple circumpolar pictorial representation of the current location of the auroral oval, which is updated every ten minutes.

    Aurora activity approximated in color bar representation. This image
    is updated every 10 minutes. See date stamp in graphic.

IS MOONLIGHT GOOD OR BAD FOR AURORA PHOTOGRAPHY?

I’ve photographed the aurora during all stages of the moon’s presence. Here are some pros and cons to both:

  • Moonlight brightens the sky, and thereby minimizes the intensity of the aurora.
  • Moonlight illuminates the foreground landscape, offering interesting compositional elements for your picture.
  • A snowy landscape that reflects the light is a big help on a completely dark night. It can provide the necessary light for a foreground landscape that contributes composition to your frame.
  • Moonless nights offer opportunities for extended exposures enhancing star trails, and silhouetting mountains or trees behind a starry night. Additionally, very stable, or slow moving aurora make good opportunities for longer exposures as well. I have written about this subject in a previous post and you can refer to that for further reading.
  • Below are two examples of aurora photos taken on a near full moon, and an evening with no moon presence. They are quite different but both very acceptable and portray very different feelings.

Comparison of two shots, one on full moon and one on a no moon night.

 


WHAT TIME OF NIGHT IS BEST FOR VIEWING THE AURORA?

It is difficult to say what exactly is the best time of night to view the aurora. There are however some generalizations:

  • Between 10:00pm to 2:00am seems to be the time frame most conducive to aurora activity, so say the scientists and my experience confirms that. Below is a quote from University of Alaska Geophysical Institute website:

“The best time to observe aurora is near local midnight, when the most active forms often occur. More precisely, the time to shoot for is an hour or two prior to local geomagnetic midnight, and the forecast maps found here are calculated for that time. If you are a serious aurora watcher, plan to spend the night from about 9 P.M. to 3 A.M. watching for auroral action. Auroral activity tends to come in waves during an evening, which are called auroral substorms. Even during an active period, there will be lulls in which the auroral activity is subdued; however, the patient observer will often see a new burst of activity within an hour or two.”

  • Stay awake and be ready. I’ve never had much luck by going to sleep and then checking periodically. By the time you actually get dressed and get all the camera gear ready, the show can easily be over.
  • Plan to spend a chunk of time viewing. The aurora displays and activity follows a somewhat predictable pattern. Whether it is a homogenous arc, a rayed arc, or a corona, they present different types of photo opportunities, at different times of the night.
  • Scout your location in daylight and thus be ready. Displays can vary in duration, sometimes hours, sometimes only minutes. Be prepared when the action happens.
  • Remember, it varies widely. I try to get out as early in the night as possible with hopes of catching a little bit of the fading dusk light (and it does not take much) since it offers some wonderful blue colors in the sky.

2) How to dress, what to wear:

This is what happens to a normally pliable shutter release cord in minus 40 degrees below zero. One need not photograph the aurora in such cold temps, but be advised that all things rubber and vinyl become very rigid. © Hugh Rose

Because aurora viewing is best in polar regions, you are likely to be in cold weather, and sometimes, very cold weather especially if you are coming to Alaska in the winter. If the thought of cold weather freaks you out, consider a time like late September or early April, when temperatures are a little warmer, but the skies are still dark at night. Getting yourself dressed properly and outfitted with the necessary equipment will greatly increase both your efficiency and enjoyment while spending a night photographing the aurora. Below are a few suggestions to help prepare you:

  • Dressing warm is essential. And get yourself mentally prepared to wait out the night. I’ve written more about cold weather photography here.
  • Good winter boots are critical. Make sure they do not fit tight. They should have a substantial base depth to them since you are often standing on cold ground in one place for long periods.
  • A pair of wool insoles inside the bottom of the boot add additional insulation, especially since one ends up standing and waiting for long periods.
  • First layer clothing: This is important! Do NOT wear cotton as the first layer against your skin. Use either polypropylene, fleece, or a soft Merino wool.
  • A warm parka: The conventional wisdom of “layering” is not so true when you are just standing around in cold temperatures. Layering is great if your heat output varies frequently as when climbing and hiking. But loft and air are what really insulate against the cold, so a puffy down parka will do the job great with a sweater underneath.
  • Glove liners that can fit inside larger warmer mittens work well.
  • Small chemically activated hand warmers are a big help. I put them either in the pockets of my down parka, or in the mittens themselves.
  • A warm nearby vehicle is a luxury.
  • Headlamp to help get set up with camera and tripod. Many headlamps are now available with a red LED to preserve your night vision, if you don’t have one of those, put a red colored gel over the light. It is amazing how adjusted your eyes become after 10 minutes in the dark of night. If you know your camera well, you can get by without using a headlamp for most of the time.
  • Be careful not to breathe directly on your camera viewfinder, lenses or LCD, they will fog/ice up quickly in cold temps.
  • If you take your camera directly into a very warm room after having it chilled down, enclose it in something first. I put my camera in the camera bag and zip it up and slowly let it come to room temperature, or inside a down parka where it remains insulated.

3) Camera and Photo gear:

CAMERAS

Graphic shows the relative size of the digital sensors from Wikipedia

I photograph with Canon Gear, currently the Canon EOS 1Ds MarkIII, which has a 21 Megapixel full frame sensor and the 5D Mark II. Canon’s other digital SLR’s are excellent options as well. Nikon has a strong lineup, and the D3 (D3s) is especially well suited for aurora photography due to its high sensitivity full frame sensor.

THE IMPORTANCE OF ISO

When photographing the aurora, high ISO capability is critical. For a good read on the importance of this over megapixels check out this article at Gizmodo: Why ISO is the New Megapixels

  • EOS 1Ds MarkIII (21MP full frame sensor)
  • Nikon D3x and D3s (24.5MP full frame sensor)
  • Nikon D3 (12MP full frame sensor)
  • Nikon D700 (12 MP full frame sensor)
  • EOS 1D MarkIII (10MP 1.3x crop)
  • EOS 1D Mark IV (16MP 1.3x crop)
  • EOS 5D MKII (21MP full frame sensor)
  • EOS 7D (18MP 1.6 crop)
  • EOS 50D (15MP 1.6x crop)
  • EOS Digital Rebel T2i (18MP 1.6x crop)

The upper end of these cameras have excellent high ISO performance with  in-camera high ISO noise reduction and long exposure noise reduction (If you are shooting .jpeg-which I don’t advise by the way) software.  Make sure that these options are turned on. Long exposure noise reduction has an auto setting and kicks in on exposures greater than 1 second. You can ignore this setting if you are shooting RAW files. ISO settings from 400 to 1600 can deliver excellent results. The length of your exposures will depend on how large of an opening (f-stop) your camera lens has. Generally, the smaller the f/stop number, the greater the $$$.

A NOTE ABOUT POINT AND SHOOT CAMERAS:

While it is not impossible to photograph the aurora with a little point and shoot digital camera, it is challenging indeed. The models are constantly changing, and perhaps in the near future it will become easier. A few of the basic limitations of most point and shoot cameras are:

If you have an digi cam with some advanced features, read your manual and see if it looks usable for aurora. You want:

  • 400 ISO, preferably 800 or higher
  • bulb mode
  • manual focus option
  • self timer release
  • wide angle lens

TRIPOD AND BALLHEADS

A tripod is absolutely essential for northern lights photography. A tall tripod will be more comfortable, as you will be aiming the camera up towards the sky. Squatting under a short tripod cranking your neck can become very uncomfortable, very fast. (NOTE: A GOOD BALLHEAD AND TRIPOD IS REALLY IMPORTANT, ON OUR PHOTO TOURS WE HAVE HAD MANY FRUSTRATED GUESTS WHOSE SMALL TRIPOD AND FLIMSY BALLHEAD EITHER BROKE OR OPERATED SO POORLY THEY MISSED MANY PHOTO OPPORTUNITIES. A GOOD TRIPOD IS WORTH IT.)

  • This Bogen 055XB tripod, although on the shorter side, is an adequate inexpensive tripod available at B&H Photo. It even has built in leg warmers to protect your hands from cold metal.
  • The GT3541 is an exceptional, and expensive, tripod from Gitzo. It is lightweight and sturdy carbon fiber, and fairly tall. Notice
    it has no center column. If you get a tripod with a center column, the ability to remove it can be advantageous for close up photography. Additionally, one should not rely on expanding the center column completely for aurora photography, since this makes the camera less stable and susceptible to wind movement during long exposures.
  • Ballheads are preferred over pan/tilt heads.Kirk Enterprises makes the BH-3, is a great smaller ballhead.
  • Foam pads on your tripod legs will help keep your hands warmer

LENSES

There are several desirable qualities to look for when considering lenses for aurora photography:

  • Wide angle
  • Fast (large aperture of F/2.8 or wider)
  • Sharp
  • Minimal vignetting
  • Inexpensive

As a general rule of thumb, you can pick any three of the above.

I have yet to discover the perfect lens, but here are a few to consider:

  • Canon 16-35mm F/2.8 USM or Nikon 17-35
    F/2.8
    : Outstanding optical performers, but not exceptionally
    fast. A bit expensive but versatile for both aurora and excellent for daytime general landscapes. It is one of my favorite lenses.
  • Canon 24mm IIL F/1.4: New from Canon, a reported improvement over the previous version. Offers a two-stop advantage
    over the 16-35. This means a 30 second aurora exposure can be
    taken in 7.5 second, freezing the shapes and giving more definition.
    Older versions can be found for about $1000.
  • Canon Super Wide Angle EF 20mm f/2.8 USM
    Inexpensive alternative to the more versatile zooms
  • Sigma 20mm F/1.8: Available for both Canon and Nikon. Provides very good performance
    for an inexpensive lens. The corners are moderately dark and
    soft, which is mostly eliminated on non-full frame digital cameras.
  • Any 50mm F/1.4 – F/1.8: These “standard”
    lenses are exceptionally inexpensive and perform well optically
    because they are “easy” to make. However, 50mm is
    not very wide and may not capture the entire aurora shape well.
  • An option for those shooting with Digital SLR’s with
    a 1.5-1.6x multiplication factor: such as the Canon 50D or Nikon D90. They are about half as fast but offer wide angle (16-18mm equivalent), and are versatile
    for other landscape work. Only compatible with
    reduced-sensor size cameras
  • Canon Zoom Super Wide AngleEF-S 10-22mm f/3.5-4.5 USM Autofocus Lens
  • Nikon Zoom Super Wide AngleAF 12-24mm f/4G ED-IF AF-S DX Zoom-Nikkor Autofocus Lens for Select Digital Cameras
  • Nikon Zoom Super Wide AngleAF 14-24mm f/2.8G ED, AF lens

OTHER RELATED EQUIPMENT

  • Batteries Have a few batteries at your disposal. Keep on warm in a parka pocket.
  • Cable release Prevents camera shake and allows for exposures in excess of 30 seconds.
  • Chemical Hand warmers I use them all the time. They can be kept inside an over mitt or in a pocket of your coat for a quick hand warming option.
  • Headlamp A headlamp allows two hands to be free while handling your camera. Consider the on-off switch before purchasing, as you will be operating the headlamp with gloves on. This Brinkmann Focused Beam LED Headlamp is a good choice, available on REI’s website

Filters on a lens can cause concentric rings to appear in the center of an image (this is a crop) be sure to remove the filter when photographing the aurora.

TAKE OFF YOUR LENS FILTER

When photographing the aurora it is important to remove the filter from your lens. Why? Look at the photo at right and you will see a series of concentric rings, which appear at the center of the image. This can be a disheartening discovery after a night of shooting the aurora, since the rings are very difficult to remove, with even the best photoshop geek on the job.

What causes the rings? Charles Deehr, a professor emeritus in physics at the University of Alaska Geophysical Institute has been quoted by Dick Hutchinson as saying:

“These are interference fringes due to the parallel faces of the filter and to the narrow spectral emission at 5577 Angstroms in the aurora. That green, atomic oxygen emission line is the strongest emission in the aurora near our film and eye peak sensitivity, so it shows up first when there is any device in the optical path which sorts out the spectral emissions.”

Harry Manos, a physics teacher from California who gave a lecture on aurora photography (and consulted Charles Deehr for material review) describes it this way:

“A haze filter in front of the lens acts as a Fabry-Perot interferometer on the 1S auroral green emission line of oxygen, creating green concentric circles.”

So what does that mean exactly? My interpretation: just take your filter off!

Rare red aurora borealis over spruce and birch trees in Fairbanks, Alaska.

ACHIEVING CRITICAL FOCUS

Pre-focusing your lens: Don’t overlook this important step. With the new genre of autofocus cameras and lenses, there is tolerance built into the lenses to accommodate for changes in temperature. For this reason, you can’t just manually turn the focus dial to infinity and be confident that it will be in focus. The old manual lenses did this perfectly, but the new ones don’t.

  • Switch your camera to a single point focus, preferably the center one.
  • Before it gets dark, focus your camera on a distant “infinity” focal point, like a mountain horizon.
  • Pick an edge that has good contrast to ensure a good focus lock. Hit the focus button a few times and make sure you see the viewfinder light that confirms focus (not just an audio beep).
  • Turn the switch on your lens to manual focus.
  • Tape the focusing dial to the non-moving barrel of the lens, to ensure that you don’t bump and move it later on in the dark.
  • If you forget to do this you can either focus directly on the moon if it is out, or use Live View.

My self portrait at a cabin in the White Mountains, near Fairbanks, Alaska. 24mm lens with self timer locked for 15 consecutive exposures. © Patrick J. Endres

Using Live View to focus: In my experience, pre-focusing has worked excellent for all lenses except the Canon Canon 24mm 1.4L. For this lens, I’ve switched to using the live-view function (if your camera has it–most DSLR’s have it). The procedure is this.

  • Manually turn your camera lens to the infinity focus mark.
  • Find the brightest object in the sky and center your camera on it by looking through the viewfinder.
  • Turn on live view and maximum zoom in on the object.
  • Adjust the focus ring until you are satisfied the object is sharp. It can be challenging if all you have is a star. If this is the case you can use a loupe on the back of the LCD monitor to help out. Depending on your eyesight–and for those needing reading glasses and don’t happen to have them on a chilly night of shooting aurora–I use a small loupe to view the back of the LCD.
  • Turn off live view and shoot.

September aurora reflecting in a tundra pond. © Patrick J. Endres

BATTERIES, COLD WEATHER, MEDIA CARDS

  • San Disk is a flash card manufacturer with a line of cards called “Extreme” which are made especially for extreme temperatures. My experience with these cards has been good.
  • Camera batteries: it is a good idea to have at least two, three is better.
  • Keep one in your pocket, or in a nearby warm place. Switching them out occasionally will keep you powered up.
  • Long exposures tend to chew up batteries quickly.
  • When waiting on a chilly night for the aurora, I remove the flash card and battery and put them in my pocket. When the action happens, I quickly put them back in the camera and start shooting.

4) Histograms, exposure, modes, file formats:

The digital age has taken much of the exposure mystery out of aurora photography, however, there are some specific issues to be aware of.

Snow loaded spruce trees and aurora with a slightly backlit sky from a low angle moon. © Patrick J. Endres

HISTOGRAMS

  • Read your histogram: The preview on the back of your camera is a good reference, but an LDC monitor on a dark night can fool you by making things appear brighter than they are. Michael Reichmann of www.luminous-landscape.com has written an article on how to read a histogram: Understanding Histograms. I strongly recommend reading through it.

EXPOSURE

  • Proper Exposure is critical: Even though a RAW file offers latitude for exposure compensation, accurate exposure is imperative, especially when shooting high ISO.
  • Shoot in RAW format: If you are uncomfortable with RAW, shoot in RAW&JPEG format (if your camera permits it). Even if you don’t know how to process a RAW file, don’t worry. Someday you will be glad you did. Consider the RAW file like a negative. It will always be there and you can process it at any time.

Corona display with the big dipper, Fairbanks, Alaska. © Patrick J. Endres

NOISE AND NOISE REDUCTION:

There are two in-camera settings that many digital cameras have that can control noise in a digital file. I recommend visiting these two articles from Canon’s website if you would like to learn more on this subject:

High ISO Noise Reduction:

    • If you are shooting in RAW format, you can ignore this in-camera setting as the noise reduction takes place in the post production process: As Canon States:

“Don’t expect the High ISO Noise Reduction you may have set in-camera to have any effect with most third-party software programs.”

  • If you are a user of Adobe Lightroom to process your RAW files, the two noise reduction tabs are referred to as LUMINANCE  and COLOR under Noise Reduction in the Detail Panel.
  • Luminance Noise:is the gray- or black-colored noise or “grain” that you often see when you look at a magnified view of an image on-screen, or closely examine a large print.  Actual subject detail is a component of the Luminance Noise, so you want to be very careful about simply removing this noise altogether — it’s very easy to blur-out the noise, and end up with a smooth picture that’s totally lacking in subject detail.
  • Chrominance Noise (or color): is also a part of high-ISO images, but it’s different.  It’s the pastel-colored, speckled noise you sometimes see in mid-tone or shadow areas, upon close inspection.  This noise has far less impact on fine details of your subjects, so it can often be reduced or removed without appearing to blur or soften your images.

Long Exposure Noise Reduction:

    • Generally, you want this setting turned on for aurora shooting, but the following quote from Canon sheds light on what actually goes on in-camera when this feature is used:

“Some users wonder why this noise reduction feature isn’t always ON at all times. The answer is that using it can slow down your shooting of one picture after another. Here’s why: to do its job, Long Exposure Noise Reduction has to re-energize your imaging sensor and in effect take a “blank” exposure, after your actual picture is taken, for the same length of time. During this time, you cannot shoot another actual picture — the red card busy light on the back of the camera stays on until the process is completed. If you shoot, for example, a 30 second exposure, the camera has to be tied-up for an additional 30 full seconds before your next picture can be taken.”

  • There are other ways to get around the in-camera long exposure noise reduction processing, but it is a more complicated procedure that requires blending images in photoshop. Astro photographers use this method but it is beyond the scope of this article.

EXPOSURE CHART BASED ON ISO 400 AND MODERATE AURORA BRIGHTNESS:

Keep in mind that the chart below is just a reference. The exposures vary based on the intensity of the aurora, the amount of ambient light from the moon, and the reflective light from the snow. The best thing to do is take a shot, look at your histogram, and make adjustments from there.

Approximate exposure times in relation to f/stop @ 400ISO – varies based on ambient light.
Camera Lens F-stop Time
Canon EF 24mm L f/1.4 7.5 seconds
Canon EF 35mm L f/2.0 15 seconds
Canon EF 24mm f/2.8 30 seconds
Canon EF 16-35mm L f/2.8 30 seconds
Canon EF 10-22mm f/3.5 50 seconds

SHOOTING MODES

If there is a great variation in the intensity of the auroral displays, and you have a fast lens, you can shoot in Aperture Priority mode, otherwise bulb or manual mode is required. I shoot both in AV and manual modes, depending on the circumstances and lens choice. As you get familiar with judging the intensity of the aurora, you can make pretty good guesses on exposure times. Remember your histogram!

  • Set your camera to Aperture priority mode.
  • Set your lens f/stop at its largest opening.
  • In general, a slight overexposure tends to be helpful when doing this, perhaps ½ to 2/3rd’s of a stop.
  • Using Bulb mode: If your exposure exceeds the in-camera timer of 30 seconds, switch your camera to Bulb mode. Plug in your cable release (or if you have the Nikon D3 you have the benefit of the built in intervolometer–come on Canon–give this one to us Canon shooters!) Your exposure will go as long as you hold the release button down. Be aware of the helpful clock that counts in seconds on the top LCD panel when shooting in bulb mode.
  • NOTE: MOST WIRELESS REMOTES CAN ONLY TRIGGER THE CAMERA SHUTTER IN ACCORD WITH AN ACTUAL SHUTTER SPEED AND DO NOT WORK ON BULB MODE. SO LOOK FOR A WIRED REMOTE THAT YOU CAN PLUG IN YOUR CAMERA AND USE WITH BULB MODE, ALLOWING FOR EXPOSURES GREATER THAN 30 SECONDS.

Star trails over Atigun Pass © Patrick J. Endres

PROCESSING RAW FILES

There are a number of programs for making modifications and corrections to raw files:

In these programs you will find the necessary tools to address white balance, color saturation and tonality, noise reduction, shadow and highlight control, etc. The question of shooting a raw file over of .jpeg file will be immediately answered at this point!

5) Checklist for photographing the Northern Lights

  1. Shoot in RAW format
  2. Turn on Long Exposure Noise Reduction
  3. Set LCD Brightness to low
  4. Remove the filter from your lens
  5. Pre focus your lens on infinity or use live-view with loupe
  6. Test exposure, consult histogram
  7. Have 2 batteries and 2 flash cards
  8. Use a tall but sturdy tripod
  9. Use a cable release (not a wireless one)
  10. Check the aurora forecasts
  11. Scout a location in daylight
  12. Don’t breath on your viewfinder
  13. Use your lens hood to protect against frost/condensation on your lens
  14. While waiting for aurora, point your camera lens down to prevent frost gathering on the glass.
  15. Have a luminex cleaning cloth accessible to clean frost from lens if necessary
  16. Put black tape over your red processing light under the wheel (for Canon users-your fellow photographers will like you)

And finally, good luck and have fun! Getting yourself in the right spot, with clear skies, good aurora activity, and smooth working gear can take a few attempts. Be patient and enjoy the night sky. You are likely to learn a few constellations in the process!

 

Polar-orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite

Be Sociable, Share!

Patrick Endres - Thanks Emma,
I’m not familiar with either of those lenses or your camera. At f/2.8 both sound ok for aperture speed, I would recommend a google search for reviews on those specific lenses.

emma cornford - firstly congrats on the best website i have seen about photographing the northen lights.
i am going to laplandin march and hope to see and photograph the lights, i have been looking at lenses for my sony alpha A200, the ones i have found are the tamron 17-50mm fstop2.8 or the tonkina 11-16mm fstop2.8.. your advice would be greatly recived.

Patrick Endres - Kerry,
The obvious big difference is the focal length range, I do not own the lenses so I can’t comment on quality, but you can explore reviews on that. The other consideration, unclear to me, is the propensity for lens flare on the 12-24 if the moon is out, which has happened on other lenses with large, rounded front elements. I suggest you do thorough review of the lenses on line.

kerry - just a follow up question about lens selection. i have seen a couple of other questions regarding using the NIKKOR 2.8/14-24MM G-ED AF-S lens? is there a really big difference vs the 2.8/17-35mm lens given that the 14-24 is heavier and bulkier?

thanks

How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera | The Father Heart of God - [...] the northern lights with a digital camera by professional photographer Patrick Endres…Via http://www.alaskaphotographyblog.com Share this:TwitterFacebookStumbleUponDiggLike this:LikeBe the first to like this [...]

MP - Thanks a lot Eric!!
How do I focus on infinity using 18-55mm lens since it does not have infinity marking on it?
Thanks
MP

Patrick Endres - MP,
I would not recommend the D60 for aurora due to poor performance at high ISO. The f/1.8 is a fast opening, but the focal length is too tight at 50mm x 1.5 on the d60, essentially 75mm. the 18-55 is wide enough, but is probably f/3.5 and therefore not fast enough with that camera. For the energy necessary to get aurora pictures, I would pursue a different combo if you are serious about. If you can’t, shoot the 18-55, use a remote cable, don’t go over 400 ISO, and get ready for 1-4 minute exposures.

MP - Thanks for this great article. I would be very thankful if you could please answer my following queries:
1. I have an old Nikon D60 camera with 18-55 & 50mm1/1.8 lens. Which lens would be better suited to click Northern Lights?
2. How do i focus on infinity, if at all this is possible with d60 and above said lenses?
Thanks again!!
MP

Patrick Endres - Thanks Darris, good luck with your shooting. And thanks for the invite south.

Darris - AMAZING! You’ve shared so much information it will take me many trips back to absorb it all . . . and happy to do so.

If you’re ever in Northern CA I would LOVE to listen to a lecture and see a slideshow. My (college) digital photography class would jump at the chance to see your work and hear your experiences!

Thanks so much for generously sharing your photographs and knowledge.

How To Capture Awesome Auroras | Country to Travel - [...] blog of Alaskan photographer Patick J. Endres offers more in-depth instructions on how to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera. He explains what you will need [...]

Patrick Endres - Shauna,
I’m not familiar with Sony cameras. The Canon and Nikon would do fine, but the lens is important also. As stated, a lens of f/2.8 or faster is optimal.

Shauna - I check the list of what kind of camera to shoot the aurora, Sony A55 isn’t on the list. I have been considering to buy a A55 for a long time, don’t Sony also work well for shooting the aurora? I am researching on Canon T2i, Sony A55, and Nikon D90, what’s better and worthy to get. Any tips?

Thank you.

Tricia - Hello Patrick,
I am planning on going to Iceland in March to see the norther lights. I have a Canon 50D with the 17-85MM lens. I get the sense this isn’t the best lens for this type of work. Can you suggest a good lens, reasonably prices, that would work with my camera and be good for this type of shooting?
Thank you,
Tricia

Patrick Endres - Tom, that is an excellent lens and I did have it listed as an option. See lenses…

Patrick Endres - Todd, I hope things worked out for you. Good luck.

Todd - OK I brushed up on the advice. I read this before and it helped the time I was out for the Milky Way and the Aurora came out. But tonight I’m out hunting specifically for the lights. KTUU says tonight’s the night, from Barrow to Prince William’s. Wish us luck. And thanks.

Northern Light Camera - FlyerTalk Forums - [...] in October & I have an SLR (which I really need to learn to use!) This may be worth a read – http://www.alaskaphotographyblog.com…igital-camera/ Also, I think a tripod is VERY important & so is a warm battery (and/or backup battery). [...]

Tom - I’m not much of a photographer yet, but the biggest noticeable missing lens on your list is the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8. It’s not cheap, but well worth a rental and if I had time to find one that is what I would be using tonight. I promise that is probably the best lens made to given the nature of the goal.

Denise - Thank you for all of the info. I live in Fort McMurray Alberta. I have been trying to catch the northern lights for 2 years. F stop and timing are my problems. Maybe tonight I will do it. I use a Pentax camera

Kate Hannon - Weather report says we may be able to see them in Massachusetts tonight. This is a great article. I also learned much about noise reduction that will serve me well in all my night photography. Thank you for sharing.

Patrick Endres - Mike,
Good luck on the aurora shooting. I travel often, but send me an email and I can try to respond to your questions.

Michael Weathers - Patrick,

I also live in Fairbanks, (and own a Canon T1i with a few lenses). These are some great shooting tips! I have yet to capture the northern lights, I am currently deployed. However, when I return I will be purchasing my 4th lens and I think I will be ready to start shooting some great photos. I would love to be able to maybe correspond with you in reference to photography and what my goals are and get your opinions if that would be alright with you. I am so excited to get back home to my family and get back to continuing my portfolio.

Thank you

Mike

How to capture amazing photos of a starlit sky. | Photo Bucket - [...] SpaceStrobist: How to Photograph Christmas LightsHow to Decorate a Starlight Wedding | eHow.comHow to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera.Hobbies & Science – How To Information | eHow.comHigh mileage trikes and morePicasa Web [...]

Patrick Endres - Mark,
Do not use any filter when photographing the aurora, you can use a polarizer for other daytime shooting however.

mark - hi,im going to Norway,end of feb,still not sure regarding filter’s can i still use a polariser?
many thanks Mark.

Patrick Endres - Jaas, do not use any filter when shooting the aurora.

Patrick Endres - Alice,
You need a tripod, a mono wont do it.

Jaas - Hello,

Terrific info about the northernlight-photography. In the article you say no filter in front of the lens. Do you mean any filter?
Or can I use a pol filter?

Regards,

Jaas

Alice Woody - Patrick,

I plan to be in Fairbanks and then in Coldfoot (perhaps there is a warning in that name!) in mid-March. I have a good, but heavy tripod. I know I should not admit this, but I rarely use the tripod, hand holding or using a rock or stump to steady the camera, because of the extra weight from lugging the tripod. I was wondering about using a monopod for shooting the aurora. Do you think that is feasible? Or is it crazy?

I add my thanks and praises for your blog to those of your other admirers.

Kind regards,
Alice

Matt Byham - Hi Patrick – what a great article, thanks for all the tips. I’m off to hopefully capture the Northern lights in a couple of weeks and am now exited that i might be able to get some images if i am lucky.

I have a Panasonic Lumix G3 camera with the standard lens 14-42mm f3.5 (35mm equivalent: 28-84mm) and am wondering if i would benefit from a any of the following three Lumix lenses that i am considering:

14mm pancake lens f2.5 (35mm equivalent: 28mm), but i’m not sure how much difference the slightly better f-stop will make in practice?

20mm pancake lens f1.7 (35mm equivalent: 40mm)

7-14mm f4.0 (35mm equivalent: 14-28mm)

I would really appreciate your feed back. Thanks in advance – Matt

Jan Armor - Tons and tons of useful info. Thanks a bunch for take the time and effort to post this. Although I live in RI, which is not exactly north of anything except NYC, I do enjoy low light shooting and your tips and techniques certainly apply. Muchos gracias!

Jan Armor

Chris Armstrong - Thanks for the advice Patrick, I leave tomorrow so I will let you know how it goes! Thanks again

Chris

Patrick Endres - Hi Chris,
While it is possible to have condensation problems, it is not really common if you follow a few basics. If you take your camera from a cold temp to a warm one, then condensation may arise. To mitigate that, put your camera in a photo bag, zip lock bag, or thick down coat when you go inside and let it come up to room temperature slowly. When you are outside, condensation won’t be a problem. FYI, in 20 years, I’ve never had a problem with it, and I just put my camera in a camera bag when going inside.
Good luck

Chris Armstrong - Hi Patrick

Great article, I was wondering if I could pick your brains a bit more?! I am going to Sweden next week and was hoping to photograph the northern lights. I have a canon 60d and a sigma 10-20mm ex lens. I have read that problems can arise with condensation forming on the camera and was wondering if you had any tips on preventing damage to camera or lens? I am staying in various cabins during my trip without electricity so will be taking several spare batteries to last!

Many thanks

Chris

Patrick Endres - Kerry,
I would advise the 16-35mm or the 17-35mm f/2.8 lenses. They are versatile for other work, and are wide enough for a aurora. The 24mm 1.4 is a fast lens, but very difficult to achieve critical focus. Good luck.

kerry ritz - @patrick. thanks for the advice on the tripod. i have a question regarding best lens. i am using Nikon 3100 and have a 18-55mm f3.5. it would appear that i will need to have a much longer exposure at 3.5. however, there are a few lens rental options available:
24mm 1.4 (most expensive); 20mm 2.8; 17-35 zoom 2.8. in terms of price/value trade off, which would be best option: zoom or fixed focal length (ie does zoom give me a bit more flexibility?); or should i just bite the bullet and rent the lens with the lowest possible aperture?

Patrick Endres - Hi Kerry,
If you don’t plan to use the tripod much, then I would agree my recommendations are expensive. However, for decent aurora photography, a good tripod makes a lot of difference. I would check into renting one, although I don’t have any rental recommendations. You might inquire at http://www.lensrentals.com

Kerry ritz - Patrick
This is one of the best sights i have read on photographing northern lights!

We will be heading to tromso in february. One option is to rent a tripod from tour company for my nikon3100. Or i can buy a tripod. However i dont want to spend a lot of money since i wont be using it very often. Weight is critical since all my photography involves travel. But i also want it to somewhat stable in snow(at least forb2 days i will be in norway). And my longest lens is 70-200 but the tripod is likely to be used with smaller lens,.
Your sugestions above are quite expensive for expected use. Do you have any other recommendations based on your guests’ experiences?
Many thanks
Kerry

Patrick Endres - Maxime, Most cameras do quite well in the cold, save for the batteries. You should be fine without any special case.

George Camilleri - Hi Patrick, I have found this second hand camera, do you think it will do the job Olympus 5060 wide zoom?

Or if you have any shop that I can search in.

Many thanks
George
Malta

Jenn Grover - I can’t thank you enough for posting this tips. I might have the opportunity to spend a few nights in northern Finland this winter and I would love to make the most of the time! Not only was the content valuable, your present it well!

Maxime - Hi Patrick, first of all thank’s a lot for this amazing article !

So full of information! I’ve got a question about the temperature..
In such cold temperatures, isn’t there any chance to have my camera (Canon 60D) inactive ? Do I need a kind of sealed case or do you think it will make it just like that with the tape on the lens to block the focus ?

Same question with Canon 550D please :)

thx

Patrick Endres - Ireri,
I’m not sure about in aurora in that region, try a google search on that.

Ireri - Hi! I Williams g to scotland tris december i would like to know if i can see some northern lights in there. Kyle of tontis is the name if one city in northern scotland can you help me with this?

Rodrigo Roesch - Hi Patrick

Sure, I already sent it. Let me know when you see it

Thank you

Patrick - Rodrigo,
I have never used that lens, perhaps you could email me a hi res version of a photo taken with it. I’d like to see what it looks like.

Rodrigo Roesch - Patrick,

Thank you so much for the information. By the way, I just bought a new lens. It is the Rokinon 14 mm, F2.8, fully manual. So far I tested it during the last red aurora display and the lens outperformed my canon 17-40mm F4, at the corners and color. Have you ever used this lens?

Patrick - Rodrigo,
My basic workflow in grading a RAW file taken of the aurora consists of tweaking many of the attributes, which include temperature, tint, exposure, brightness, contrast, vibrance, noise reduction, etc., By nature of a RAW file, it has not particular profile attached to it, like in the days of shooting specific film types, so its up to you to render it in the fashion you find most appropriate. As for what that is… it depends on the person. Aurora captured on a camera rarely looks like the eye saw it anyway, since you are dealing with a timed exposure, and a digital sensor that is able to capture colors that it is hard to see with the human eye. I try not to change the scene much from what the camera captured, in terms of color or saturation, but I do work on them heavily in LR to make tonality and contrast appropriate.

Rodrigo Roesch - Hi Patrick

Thank you again for all the useful tips about northern lights photography. You pictures are fantastic. I just have a question. What is your criteria for photo enhancement. I usually improve my pictures by slightly touching highlights and shadows (so I can see more details of the aurora), contras and saturation as well as applying noise reduction and sharpening. Sometimes, I also improve exposure when I overexpose or underexpose the pic a bit. Do you think it is valid? or pictures should not be changed at all? I never change hues or colors.
Thank you so much

Patrick - Achal,
Thanks for you comments. If you want to see the aurora, come to Alaska in late August early to mid-September. It is still warm, but just beginning to get dark enough at night to see the aurora. Good luck.

achal garg - Hi

Firstly, I love your photographs, and I wish I could intern with you, do you by any chance take interns?…Anyway, I am from India and I am coming to LA to see my brother this december. We were planning to visit Alaska, but I’m afraid that’s not a very good season especially if you wanna see the aurorae(as per the stats)..pls suggest what I should do I really wanna visit Alaska once and after this it might be really impossible for me…Also the thought of extremely cold temps is a bit scary..but I can manage, ‘coz the will power right now is a little too pushy…

Patrick - LIbby,
There are many cloud services available. I use the one associated with my website, which offers 1TB of storage with the monthly pro account fee. I’m not familiar specifically with other cloud storage options, but I know there are many out there. A thorough google search should return some good options.

Patrick - Robert,
The 15mm 2.8 should be a fun lens. Be careful of distortion, which can work for you or against you depending on what you seek to portray. Using one lens for a bit is a great way to start. Once you have a handle on how that produces you can explore other lenses that are fast and wide.

Patrick - Rick, you are most welcome. I’m delighted you found the information helpful and your efforts productive.

Rick LaRosa - Hi Patrick and all who follow this great site / blog – Our family just came back from a week+ trip into and around Fairbanks. We went specifically to see the aurora and studied Patrick’s advice religiously before we started our trip. Like many before us I’m back to report the advice was priceless!!! We felt very prepared, came back with tons of great photos (we got very luck with clear nights and two level 4 aurora alert nights) and lots of great memories. We did plan our trip properly too around a new moon, solar rotation, dark skies and historically active months but the advise on cold weather gear, camera equipment and locations was excellent. Can’t thank Patrick enough for all his experience, advice and (more than anything else) his willingness to share all this. We shot with a 17mm and a 15mm at 2.8 on a canon 5d and an astro-modified canon 50d. Stopped by UAF to get advice on viewing locations (they recommended the parking area near Skiland) and we found milepost 52 on the Elliot Hwy great and easily accessible. Anyway, THANKS for everything!, – Rick

Robert Paige - Patrick,
Thanks again for the site i referance it just about everyday just to see if there is any new tips or tricks… but i got a question for you; i just got a f2.8 15mm fish-eye and i was wondering what your take would be on this. i shoot with a rebel t2i and this is the first wide angle lens that i own. if there is any other lens that i should get and/or how to use it would be much appriceated. thanks again for your time.

-Paige

Libby - Patrick, thank you again for your wonderful tips on photographing the Aurora. My husband and I will leave for Fairbanks in another week. My worry is the storage of my photographs. I shoot in RAW – big files – and I am very worried about losing another external hard drive (I left one on the train once, and another got erased by accident! AACCKK!!). I would like to try one of the “clouds” but it looks as if these places turn your photos into jpegs. I tried to upload ONE photo to Dropbox and it took 8 minutes. Since I will have thousands maybe this won’t work. Do you use one of these services?
Thank you!

Patrick - Jay, you are very welcome

What we’ve been reading in…September | Trading365.co.uk | Blog: Shopping Deals UK, Discount Codes, Price Comparisons, News & Reviews - [...] keen to learn how to photograph the northern lights will find this lesson by Patrick J. Endres on alaskaphotographyblog.com very useful. In my own article called ‘Astronomy Gastronomy: The Northern Lights’, I advised [...]

Jay Patel - Hi Patrick,

This is an excellent write up. Thank you so much for sharing your knowledge.

-Jay

Patrick - Nigel,
Given the equipment you have, which should be sufficient, be aware that your exposures will be a little longer when shooting at f/3.5. For that reason, you want the flexibility of having a longer exposure than 30 seconds, which if I remember correctly, is the limit of the wireless remote. (are you sure it works in bulb mode? – if it does, your set, but I’m skeptical) If it does not exceed a 30 second exposure, get a remote that connects directly to the camera. Other than that, experiment and have fun.

Nigel Final - Hi… Thank you for an excellent article re photographing the Northern Lights.

I live in a very remote part of Scotland about 30 miles south of Aberdeen and what I lack in Camera equipment I think will be partially offset by the location. The position I have in mind is just 100 yards from my house and I can park the car right where my tripod will be standing. There will be no street lights and I will be in the total dark with a clear view of the sky from NE to SW.

I own a Cannon EOS 500d and various lenses but the one that I will be using will be my Tamron 18 – 270 f3.5. I also have a wireless remote that works with the bulb setting.

My location here might not give the spectacular results that you get in Alaska but I hope and believe that I will get some reasonable pictures. I will follow your suggestions to the word and look forward to some decent photos from the depths of Northern Scotland :smile:

Given the equipment that I have if you have any other suggestions I would love to know what they might be but I respect that you are a busy person and cannot reply to many e-mails.

Once again, Thank You for a very helpful article.

Cheers

Nigel Final.

Nike Shoes Australia - Thank you!!Looking forward to your better and better articles.

Patrick - That’s a long haul from Florida, it should be a fantastic trip. In the best scenario, you would not see the northern lights until about late August to early September because of daylight. Keep that in mind.

Best Photography Portfolios - We are looking at making the drive from S Florida to Fairbanks this summer while pulling a cargo trailer. I would like to see the lights at Fairbanks.

Any suggestions on how to make this long drive memorable with my photography passion ?

Rodrigo Roesch - Hi Patrick
Thank you for the information. I guess, I will live with that :) . The aurora pics come very nice in general with this lense (even here at Green Bay, WI). The color correction for the lens is very good too, the only think I wish is if the lense would be a bit faster.
Best regards,
Rodrigo

Patrick - Rodrigo,
I have not used the 17-40 for aurora photography. I can tell you however, that all lenses that I have used, including non-zoom primes, at wide open apertures, all degrade in quality at the corners. This is exhibited in loss of sharpness but specifically in what I call flying birds (although there is surely a technical name that I’ve forgotten) which is the stretching of the stars. It appears as though they have wings. Unfortunately, it is something to contend with.

Rodrigo Roesch - Hi Patrick

Do you have any experience with Canon 17-40mm F4? This is the lens I have been using for auroras but stars are not good at the corners at 17mm F4. I wonder if my lense needs repair or it is the way this lense is
Thank you
Rodrigo

Rodrigo Roesch - Thank you for the article, it is very usefull. I also could add using Noise Ninja for noise reduction. It works very well and you can skip long exposure noise reduction and save time.

Une chasse aux aurores boréales ? | Club Plein Air Altitude - [...] Si vous comptez prendre des photos, enlevez les filtres des objectifs si vous en avez, j’en ai loupé pas mal à cause de ça (des ronds concentriques apparaissent sur l’image). Il y’a un guide assez bien fait qui explique bien comment se préparer. [...]

Patrick - Libby,
The main thing about shooting near Fairbanks is getting away from the city light pollution. So I would recommend locations along the Chena Hot Springs road, or the Steese or Elliot highways. One need not drive far from town to the north or east to get away from the city lights.

Libby - Thank you, Patrick, for a most thorough article. My husband and I are coming to Fairbanks in order to see/photograph the Aurora, so I’m beginning to think I would not have had a ghost of a chance if I hadn’t come across your very helpful instructions.
Are there any particular sites for the photographs in Fairbanks that you could recommend?

Blog de Laura » Blog Archive » Un proyecto - [...] información posible y aprovecho para dar las gracias a los que ya me habéis echado una mano, dejo un buen enlace que me será de gran utilidad, con sólo ver la imagen del autor, Patrick J. Endres, puedes [...]

Quick.... - [...] [...]

Rick - Our family is making a trip up to Fairbanks this year at the end of September / early October just for the Aurora. Can’t wait! Your site IS the best I’ve seen to help us get ready and for our photography time. Want to join us for a night? Thanks! – Rick

Patrick - You are welcome!

alaskantiger (Anchorage DE) - Link back- thanks for helping the tourists understand how to capture the Lights before they come up.

Patrick - Shawn, You are welcome, and I’m sure it is a challenge shooting aurora that far south!

Shawn - Thanks much for a great article! Been shooting distant Northern Lights right here in Green Bay, Wisconsin. Lots of fun but having them low on the horizon at great distance does not make it easy (or dramatic).

Therein » Blog Archive » alaska northern lights pictures - [...] How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera … Mar 15, 2011 … By Photographer Patrick J. Endres Updated 3/15/2011 If you find the information here helpful please … [...]

Patrick - Good luck Andrea!

Andrea - Thanks for posting this great guide! We will be in Iceland this weekend–probably too late for the aurora but it doesn’t hurt to be prepared during those very short dark hours that are left. I’ll be sure to share any results if we happen to get any!

Obtaining » Blog Archive » northern lights photos - [...] How to photograph the northern lights with a digital camera … Mar 15, 2011 … By Photographer Patrick J. Endres Updated 3/15/2011 If you find the information here helpful please … [...]

Patrick - Thanks Jake, Maria and Martha, I’m glad you found the article helpful. Good luck with your shooting.

marthalay - wow..what a complete information….thanks a lot..i am surfing the internet for my next trip to see aurora and here iam, got it all..

Maria Kirkwood - HI

Wow! I found your website amazing. The photo’s were wonderful to look at and my dream is to one day come and see the Northern Lights myself. I am even more determind since seeing your pictures. I also found all your additional information very interesting and very helpful. We are very lucky that we have people like you that can capture such wonders of our world.

Thank you

Maria

Iceland Aurora Borealis / Seltjarnarnes Lighthouse, Grotta | Photography Iceland - [...] times and with whatever gear you have access to.  A great place to start on the web is:  Alaska Photography Blog, which is a fantastic BLOG with amazing photos and detailed [...]

Behind the Shutter - Aurora Ribbon Overhead - [...] First, Patrick Endres has a great article about how to shoot aurora that is way more detailed than what I am going to go into here, but seriously read his blog it is amazing. [...]

jake - thanks for the article its really informative and helpful – i have just got my first camera; a Fuji fine pix HS10 super zoom, in order to go to Iceland next week, and heres hoping see the aurora Borealis thanks again for your tips :)

Patrick - Robin,
Good luck, share your results.

Patrick - Fantastic Nick,
Glad to hear of your successful sky and camera connection. Keep on shooting…

Nick Cerone Jr - IT WORKED!!…Had a great show of the Aurora last night and managed to get some great images (at least to me).. Hope to experiment some more before the 24 hour daylight takes over.. Thanks again for your help..Best of Luck to Everyone.~Peace

Robin McCann - Very helpful advice, now I only have to hope to see the lights. will be in northern Norway in two weeks. I have a Panasonic Lumix DMC FZ50 and although it’s not an SLR takes great night shots. So here’s hoping.

Patrick - Nic,
You are welcome. I will continue to update this article, so check back. Good luck up there, the daylight must be rushing in on you by now.

Nick Cerone Jr - Thanks for the help. I’m currently on the north slope and hope to try and get some pics of the aurora. I’m using a cannon t1a slr with 15-55 and 55-250 lenses..It’s the first “real”camera I’ve ever had and I’m completely overwhelmed by all its capabilities. I’ll be refering back to your site I’m sure for more hints and ideas… Thanks!

~Nick

Patrick - Eric,
You’re welcome. Definitely shoot in RAW or RAW/JPEG if the camera permits. I have not tested that Rebel, so I can’t comment on image quality. Do a little experimenting. Long exposures are o.k. if the aurora is not moving too quickly, you can then bring your ISO down a bit. You may find acceptable results even at 1600 ISO.

Brian,
If you shoot in RAW, it does not matter much what your white balance is since that is all tweaked in post production. However, auto white balance is what I use and makes a pretty good starting point. Some slight cooling is often necessary, but it depends on aurora color, intensity, moonlight, etc.

Brian Weeks - Great Article!

How do you usually set your white balance ?

Thanks!

Eric Koz - Thank you so much for writing down this information! I bought my first DSLR (Canon Rebel XTi) last spring and have been hooked on photography since then. I recently bought a Tamron 18-270 lens (to replace my “entry level” Canon EF 18-55 and 75-300 lenses). Two weeks ago I managed to get a few good shots of the northern lights from here in ANC. This weekend I will be in Talkeetna and the forecast looks excellent, I am hoping to get some better shots.

I have shot in RAW a few times, and I think I need to better understand my editing software before I can really utilize all of it’s capabilities, but the information in your blog makes me want to use RAW more often.

My camera’s ISO only goes up to 1600, and the f-stop on my new lens stops at 3.5 – do you have any suggestions for how I can get the best images of the northern lights (given these constraints?)

Thanks for your help and information!! -Eric

Your email is never published or shared. Required fields are marked *

*

*

There was an error submitting your comment. Please try again.